RESEARCH MEMORANDUMSOURCE REPOSITORY ↗
TOKENIZED EQUITIESRIGHTS ≠ EXPOSURE

Same $100,000.
Different rules.

ABSTRACT

Economic exposure can look identical while redemption, transfer and lending rights diverge. Know what you own before deciding what it is worth.

Read the investment thesis ↓
TERMS
MATTER
02

One stock. Two sets of terms.

Fictional wrapper comparison. These are not verified issuer terms.

RIGHT / CONDITIONWRAPPER AWRAPPER B
Economic exposure$100,000$100,000
Redemption windowDailyWeekly
Transfer eligibilityVerified walletsJurisdiction restricted
Lending permissionExplicitly permittedNot established

Understand the idea. Change the inputs. See the dollars.

Read the guide & try the simulation →
04

The decision rule

THE MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION

Terms become executable predicates.

Eligible(w, a) = ∧ₖ₌₁ᵐ Pₖ(w, a)

RiskWeightᵢ = min(1, g(redemption, transfer, jurisdiction, lending))

w
Wallet attributes and verification state
a
Requested transfer, lending or redemption
Pₖ
A required rights predicate
g
A specified rights-to-risk mapping

Eligibility depends on documented predicates. The risk-weight mapping must be specified and validated independently.

05

Where rights meet rails.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

This is a marketing concept. No order, payment or reservation is placed.

Read the thesis →